<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAIR ARBITRATION ACT OF 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arbitrationhorrorstories.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/fair-arbitration-act-of-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arbitrationhorrorstories.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/fair-arbitration-act-of-2007/</link>
	<description>Tell us your story...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 05:12:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://arbitrationhorrorstories.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/fair-arbitration-act-of-2007/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cindy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arbitrationhorrorstories.wordpress.com/?p=5#comment-3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The way I understand it, the Arbitration Fairness Act will make pre-dispute, binding mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer contracts unenforceable.  That is what so many of the org&#039;s that support the bill feel will go a long way toward leveling the playing field.

One problem I feel will crop up anyway is an ongoing lack of knowledge about what arbitration run by industries is really about.  Consumers may still be tricked into agreeing to it after a dispute arises, with the same biased arbitrators doing the same repeat business w/corporations, etc.  BUT, I think that education can fix this, and passage of such a law would go a long way towards consumers&#039; lawyers being more aware of the problems, too.  I doubt any effort will fix all the problems associated with any given issue, but this bill will go a long way toward that end.  Doing nothing will just mean business as usual, where consumers have no choice unless they want to forego a phone, computer, credit card, house, car, and so on.

As an aside, I would like to urge consumers to at least TRY to refuse doing business unless the arbitration clause is thrown out of the deal.  I am not the only one I have heard of who has refused to buy a new car unless a dealer removed the arbitration clause from all of their contracts.  While the car maker&#039;s warranty is non negotiable and subject to state Lemon Laws anyway, the dealer can and sometimes will alter a &#039;standard&#039; contract if you are prepared to walk.  We got the arbitration clause thrown out of the contract.  We would&#039;ve walked if they didn&#039;t toss it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I understand it, the Arbitration Fairness Act will make pre-dispute, binding mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer contracts unenforceable.  That is what so many of the org&#8217;s that support the bill feel will go a long way toward leveling the playing field.</p>
<p>One problem I feel will crop up anyway is an ongoing lack of knowledge about what arbitration run by industries is really about.  Consumers may still be tricked into agreeing to it after a dispute arises, with the same biased arbitrators doing the same repeat business w/corporations, etc.  BUT, I think that education can fix this, and passage of such a law would go a long way towards consumers&#8217; lawyers being more aware of the problems, too.  I doubt any effort will fix all the problems associated with any given issue, but this bill will go a long way toward that end.  Doing nothing will just mean business as usual, where consumers have no choice unless they want to forego a phone, computer, credit card, house, car, and so on.</p>
<p>As an aside, I would like to urge consumers to at least TRY to refuse doing business unless the arbitration clause is thrown out of the deal.  I am not the only one I have heard of who has refused to buy a new car unless a dealer removed the arbitration clause from all of their contracts.  While the car maker&#8217;s warranty is non negotiable and subject to state Lemon Laws anyway, the dealer can and sometimes will alter a &#8216;standard&#8217; contract if you are prepared to walk.  We got the arbitration clause thrown out of the contract.  We would&#8217;ve walked if they didn&#8217;t toss it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

